The Journey

Did the Early Church Believe in Apostolic Succession?

Jesus commissioned Apostles.

The Apostles established churches.

Then the Apostles died.

What happened next?

Look for the Pattern

Investigate the New Testament and earliest Christian writings for:

  • appointment of ministers
  • laying on of hands
  • preservation of received teaching
  • bishops
  • presbyters
  • deacons
  • succession
  • unity
  • responses to false teaching

Why This Question Matters

If Christianity is merely a collection of correct ideas, institutional continuity may seem secondary.

But if Christ established a visible Church and entrusted teaching and sacramental responsibilities to particular ministers, succession becomes much more significant.

Irenaeus and Competing Christianities

By the late second century, Christians faced groups claiming alternate or secret versions of authentic Christianity.

Irenaeus' response is historically important.

He appeals to the public faith handed down through churches connected with the Apostles and to succession in their leadership.

That does not automatically settle every later Catholic claim.

But it raises an important question:

Why was succession already relevant to arguments about authentic Christianity so early?

The Larger Question

If Apostolic succession was an early means of preserving Christian teaching and communion, was it merely temporary?

Or was it part of how Christ intended His Church to remain connected visibly to the Apostles?

That takes us beneath individual doctrines to the question of authority itself.

Who Has Authority to Interpret Christianity? →

← PreviousWhat Did Early Christians Believe About Baptism?Next →Who Has Authority to Interpret the Bible and Christian Doctrine?